Having announced a huge yearly revenue increase just last Friday,
Nasdaq-listed Chinese advertising company Focus Media found itself in the
spotlight for far less welcome reasons Wednesday, as it appeared in court
charged with unfair competition.
In the case's first hearing at Shanghai No 1 Intermediate People's Court,
Focus Media Holding Ltd and Shanghai Focus Media Advertising Co Ltd were jointly
accused of illegally trying to expand their presence in 13 Hymart supermarkets
in Shanghai and Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province.
The case was brought by CGEN Digital Media Network Co Ltd, one of Focus
Media's major competitors, which claims Focus approached the 13 stores
encouraging them to break their contracts with CGEN.
CGEN is demanding Focus cease all activities in the 13 stores, issue a public
apology, and pay more than 13 million yuan (US$1.6 million) compensation.
Specializing in selling advertising space on LCD television screens in large
supermarkets, CGEN claims it signed three-year exclusive contracts with 13
Hymart stores 11 in Shanghai and two in Hangzhou in 2004.
Attorney for CGEN Zhong Jinguang told the court yesterday that the company
sent letters to the 13 stores in March, 2005, warning them not to breach the
contracts by working with any "third party."
A month later CGEN received replies from the Shanghai Kangren Hymart
Supermarket Trading Co Ltd which manages the stores, terminating the contracts.
"They accused CGEN of violating Internet law and other problems," Zhong said.
"But those were all excuses."
Zhong showed the court a copy of Focus Media's international prospectus
published in July, 2005.
In it, Focus says it is in the process of expanding its network into the
Hymart chain, adding that, in order to ensure its presence in the stores, it has
agreed to compensate the supermarket chain for costs incurred in defending any
breach of contract suit brought by CGEN against Hymart.
CGEN successfully sued the 13 Hymart stores late last year, with the court
ordering Hymart to pay CGEN 300,000 yuan (US$37,040) in compensation.
Representing Shanghai Focus, Yang Ming accepted Shanghai Focus had signed
contracts with two Hymart stores in Hangzhou and installed facilities in 11
Shanghai stores, but said everything had been done in accordance with the law.
As his client's relationship with Focus Media Holding Ltd was purely as a
business partner in Shanghai, he added, Shanghai Focus could not be held
responsible for Focus Media's behaviour elsewhere.
"The prospectus was published in the United States and it is not proper to
judge its validity in China," he said.
The case continues.