FMs agree to jointly push for 6-Party Talks By Le Tian (China Daily) Updated: 2006-06-28 07:13
The foreign ministers of China and the Republic of Korea (ROK) yesterday
agreed to make joint efforts to resume talks designed to end the nuclear
stalemate on the Korean Peninsula.
They also agreed that the possible test launch of a missile by the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) should not affect peace and stability on the
peninsula.
The consensus was reached after an hour of closed talks between Foreign
Minister Li Zhaoxing and his ROK counterpart Ban Ki-moon in Beijing.
The ministers agreed that "under the current situation, the relevant parties
should stick to solving this issue through dialogue and peaceful means, and try
to defuse the confrontational atmosphere," foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu
said at a regular news briefing yesterday.
Ban arrived in Beijing on Monday night to discuss with Chinese officials how
to dissuade Pyongyang from reported plans to test launch a long-range missile.
Recent intelligence reports have said the DPRK may be fuelling a Taepodong-2,
one of its most advanced missiles, at a launch site on the country's
northeastern coast. The United States has called on Pyongyang to declare its
intentions.
The six-party nuclear negotiations remain deadlocked since the last round in
November last year. Pyongyang is boycotting the talks, saying that the US must
lift sanctions it imposed on companies suspected of laundering money and
counterfeiting for the DPRK.
At yesterday's news conference, Jiang also said Japan should work with China
to create an appropriate atmosphere for mutual "contacts and visits" between the
two foreign ministers. Jiang made the remarks when addressing questions about
whether there is an arrangement for Li and his Japanese counterpart Taro Aso to
meet on the sidelines of a regional ministerial conference in Malaysia later
next month.
"It is of great significance that the two foreign ministers have contact and
mutual visits," said Jiang. However she added that there are no such an
arrangements so far.
(China Daily 06/28/2006 page2)
|