Society

Substandard public project to be torn down

By Jin Zhu (China Daily)
Updated: 2011-01-14 07:42
Large Medium Small

Substandard public project to be torn down
Residents look over a model of the Sunny Paradise subsidized housing project on Nov 25, 2009. [Photo/for China Daily] 

Beijing - The municipal government has, in a rare move, ordered a government-subsidized housing project in the city to be torn down because of shoddy construction.

Related readings:
Substandard public project to be torn downPlug pulled on power company's housing project 
Substandard public project to be torn downHousing project for Xinjiang's shepherds 
Substandard public project to be torn downModern minimalism housing project for Pudong 

The news made headlines last year for being the first such case, although poor quality is a problem that plagues many subsidized housing projects.

The Sunny Paradise residential complex in the capital's Daxing district includes nine subsidized buildings. A government inspection in August found six of the nine under-construction buildings were built with substandard concrete. The government ordered them demolished.

Two of the three other buildings required reinforcement, the Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-Rural Development said.

Demolition work was scheduled for completion two months after it began on Oct 9, China Central Television (CCTV) reported in October.

"Seeing the buildings fall made my heart ache," a homebuyer surnamed Han said in the CCTV report.

"Construction began in December 2009, and some buildings have grown to nine stories. They were supposed to be finished this June. But now, I have no idea when I can move in."

The aboveground structures were destroyed while the underground foundations required reinforcement, the Beijing-based Legal Weekly newspaper reported.

A total of 7,933 cubic meters of concrete contained insufficient cement, the Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-Rural Development announced in November.

Officials of the Beijing-based cement provider were administratively detained for their deceptive business practices.

The developer has not yet set a reconstruction date.

"The building project must be delayed according to the timing of the current demolition process," a Daxing district housing commission office official, who declined to be named, said.

"The precise date when residents can move in has not yet been determined."

The office has assisted homebuyers get refunds since Nov 12.

"I'm not sure I can find another affordable home if I give up this apartment," an unnamed resident said on Sunny Paradise's online forum.

"But even though I can get some compensation from the developer, I'm still losing a lot of money because I have to spend a lot to rent another place."

Li Wenjie, regional general manager of Centaline Group property agency, said in an earlier interview: "It's typical that affordable housing developers cut costs, because such compounds are less profitable than commercial homes, although the country already offers preferential policies for affordable housing project developers, particularly in terms of taxation and land leases."

Sunny Paradise's apartments were sold for about 4,190 yuan ($634) per square meter, while commercial apartments in the same complex cost 23,000 yuan per square meter.

No quality problems were found with the expensive apartments, for which the developer used a different cement supplier, earlier reports said.

Other subsidized housing projects have been found to have similar quality problems. The walls of the Ruiqi residential complex in Beijing's Xisanqi area, for example, cracked easily.

But homebuyers who purchase subsidized apartments tend to remain silent because of the lower prices they paid. Local governments, especially those of second-tier and third-tier cities, also show little concern about examining subsidized housing's quality.

"Stricter quality-control measures are needed," Li said.