print edition
China Daily
HK edition
business weekly
Shanghai star
reports from China
web edition news
 
   
   
 
government info economic insights campus life Shanghai today metropolitan  
   
       
  Enron alarm bells ring here
(CHANG TIANLE)
02/01/2002

While the world was stunned by Enron's bankruptcy and the role of Arthur Andersen LLP in the fiasco, Chinese investors have realized that irregularities occur not only in China's fledging accounting business, but also among foreign accounting firms.

"I used to support the authority's decision to use international accounting firms rather than domestic ones," said Cai Guangqiang, a 52-year-old investor. "But in the light of the Enron-Andersen scandal, I think we should look at this decision carefully. It's not correct to have blind faith in big shots from foreign accounting firms."

Cai suffered a great loss from an investment in Yinguangxia, a listed company whose share price plummeted last year after it was found to have been involved in stock fraud.

Heated debate

Zhongtianqin, a Shenzhen-based accounting firm, was found to have helped Yinguangxia fabricate profit reports to win a top performer position. Zhongtianqin's licence has since been cancelled by the Ministry of Finance.

More than 60 listed company clients of Zhongtianqin, which was previously the largest and most renowned accounting firm in China, have had their reputations seriously damaged because of the accounting firms's fraudulent actions.

This scandal combined with several other stock fraud incidents led China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) to invite foreign accounting firms to audit listed companies.

Earlier last year, CSRC stipulated that listed financial companies needed to have their financial statements audited by one of the Big Five international accounting firms before disclosure.

At the end of last year, the market watchdog went even further.

On December 31, CSRC released a provisional rule stating that, starting this year, public firms must use international accounting firms and make "supplementary" audit report before they issue new shares.

The last decision sparked heated debate in the accounting community.

Cautious development

For the foreign players, especially the so-called Big Five, it's a bittersweet new year gift.

The Big Five - Andersen, Deloitte Touche Tomatsu (DTT), PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG and Ernst & Young - have set up joint ventures in China.

"There have been quite a few domestic enterprises contacting us, including listed companies. And I think the same is true of the four other accounting firms," said Christopher Lu, head of DTT's Shanghai unit.

He shows caution rather than enthusiasm.

"We make very deliberate evaluations before we accept a new client," he said.

The Big Five are strong in international expertise, but working with Chinese enterprises is quite a different story.

According to Lu, the difference poses more challenge and audit risk for international accountants.

When the Big Five came to China a decade ago, they only served their existing multinational clients operating in China. However, in the last few years, they have witnessed a sharp surge in business from Chinese enterprises, especially the large State-owned enterprises, overseas-listed companies and private ventures.

DTT's China revenue increased by more than 20 per cent in the last two years and about 30 per cent of the revenue comes from domestic firms.

Challenges lie ahead

His view is shared by Professor Li Ruoshan, dean of the Accounting Department at Fudan University, and his primary concern is the potential misuse of the new rule.

All foreign accounting firms have their local partners, which means it is possible that the first audit report and the supplementary report are in fact issued by the same auditor as long as the firm has two identities.

He also pointed out that the new rule is not in line with the World Trade Organization's national treatment principal.

Domestic accountants show even great concern to the new provision, saying it is unfair to them.

"The policy excludes all domestic accounting firms where the majority are honest and law-abiding," complained a senior official with a leading Shanghai accounting firm, who preferred not to be identified.

Li believes it is a transitional measure as authorities hope experienced foreign accountants can reduce the number of fake accounts and guarantee the credibility of companies.

   
       
               
         
               
   
 

| frontpage | nation | business | HK\Taiwan | snapshots | focus |
| governmentinfo | economic insights | campus life | Shanghai today | metropolitan |

   
 
 
   
 
 
  | Copyright 2000 By China Daily Hong Kong Edition. All rights reserved. |
| Email: cndyhked@chinadaily.com.cn | Fax: 25559103 | News: 25185107 | Subscription: 25185130 |
| Advertising: 25185128 | Price: HK$5 |