Kelly speaks at child porn trial, won't testify

(Agencies)
2008-06-11 09:24
Large Medium Small

Gaughn agreed, but added that he would instruct the jurors before they begin deliberating that they shouldn't put too much emphasis on the tape alone.

A prosecution witness also took the stand for a second time to rebut defense claims about the tape. The defense and prosecution both have rested their cases but video expert Grant Fredericks' testimony is part of the prosecution's right of rebuttal.

A version of the video that the defense used in presenting their case was misleading because it was such low quality, Fredericks told jurors.

The defense argued that in their version of the tape there is no mole on the back of the man who appeared, proving the man is not Kelly, who has such a mole.

But Fredericks says higher quality versions of the tape clearly show a mole on the man's back.

The defense and prosecutors also sparred in court Tuesday about who made certain copies of the tape and whether that may have undermined the defense's case.

Closing arguments are likely to be delivered Thursday.

   Previous Page 1 2 Next Page