China's banks inch toward top of shipping finance

As Western banks withdraw, Chinese counterparts, with abundant capital, are providing new loans

Chinese lenders are fast becoming global leaders in ship financing, while Western banks are reducing or exiting their shipping loan portfolios. That disengagement is due to increasingly strict capital requirement regulations being enforced as the world's shipping industry faces its worst downturn in three decades.

In 2014, the last year for which statistics are available, three out of 15 of the world's largest shipping lenders were Chinese banks, together providing $45.3 billion of financing. That is just under 20 percent of the $258 billion total shipping finance debt of the top 15 lenders' combined, according the US-based intelligence firm Marine Money.

In 2007, before the financial crisis and consequent shipping market downturn, none of the Chinese banks made the global top 15 shipping lenders.

The three banks are Bank of China, the Export-Import Bank of China, and China Development Bank, ranking sixth, eighth and 15th, providing loan volumes of $18.5 billion, $15.8 billion and $11 billion respectively.

Industry insiders cite Chinese lenders' abundant capital and long-term perspective as key reasons behind their emergence, adding that they have entered the shipping finance market at an opportune time because ship asset valuations are already at a historical low, hence risks for a further fall in value are minimized.

"Chinese banks' increasing level of activity is very helpful for the entire shipping industry's dynamics in a difficult time," said Nigel Thomas, a partner at the law firm Watson Farley & Williams, who specializes in shipping finance.

"Despite the current low valuation on shipping assets, over the long term at least some sectors of shipping are expected to generate solid returns. Currently, many shipping assets, which are fundamentally sound from a longer-term perspective, are competing for sources of financing, so it is a good opportunity for Chinese banks to select more solid shipping assets to finance."

The global shipping industry has suffered from severely slashed commodity demand in recent years. The Baltic Dry Bulk Index, the most common measure of shipping activity levels, touched 290 points in February, marking the lowest level since records began in 1985. In May 2008, the index reached a peak of 11,793 points.

As of March 1, 2016, the global order book for new vessels totaled 4,461 ships of 283.2 million deadweight tons, down 11 percent year-on-year.

Meanwhile, banks globally face increasingly strict capital requirements. Under Basel III, the latest rules for improving regulation, supervision and risk management, for example, banks are required to set aside more capital for shipping finance compared with other types of financing such as property loans or business loans, meaning many Western banks now view shipping finance to be unprofitable.

Within such a context, Chinese banks were able to secure deals with some of the world's largest ship owners, such as Mediterranean Shipping Co, BP Shipping and Bourbon, all of which are considered the most attractive borrowers because their size means the risk of loan default is almost zero.

A recent example of a Chinese finance deal is ICBC Financial Leasing providing 18 tankers to BP Shipping over the next 10 years, a transaction announced in October, estimated to be worth $869 million.

"Shipping finance entities compete with each other on three aspects, which are volume, pricing and structure of deal, and ICBC was able to outperform other lenders on all three levels," said Dmitri Mikhno, director of London-based Clarksons Platou Debt & Leasing Solutions.

Alun Hatfield, managing director of Clarksons, added that Chinese banks' more recent entry into the leasing business means they have more capacity to take on new loans because their capital is not tied to existing shipping portfolios. In comparison, many Western banks already have billions of dollars of shipping loan portfolios on their books, which makes further lending difficult.

In addition to financing new vessels, some experts believe opportunities exist for Chinese banks to purchase existing shipping loan portfolios of Western banks that are looking to exit ship financing to free up capital.

Sellers in this market are plenty. Lloyds Banking Group exited the shipping market in 2014 when it sold the last $500 million of loans from its ship finance portfolio. That same year, Commerzbank sold a shipping portfolio worth 160 million euros ($182 million), and in 2015, Reuters reported that RBS put up $5 billion of shipping assets for sale.

Christoforos Bisbikos, a Hong Kong-based partner at shipping finance experts WFW, said buying existing loans allows Chinese banks to get a good assessment of the credibility of ship owners. "Buying existing loan portfolios is the best credit check you can get, because you can get trade records of the ship owners that could go back decades, so it reduces the risks of lending to those owners."

Harry Theochari, global head of transport at London-based law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, said that the downside risks for Chinese banks to own these shipping portfolios is smaller than for Western banks, because they would probably buy these portfolios at a discount to market value.

Andreas Povlsen, founder and CEO of the London-based maritime finance firm Breakwater Capital, added that Chinese banks should make sure that their financing activities do not distort the market.

"It is important that Chinese banks study the quality and specification of the ships they finance carefully. They should focus on efficient procedures to monitor the assets and effectuate the closing of the deals, and make sure the deals are structured appropriately," Povlsen said.

cecily.liu@mail.chinadailyuk.com

(Left) Two people pass by the branch of Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) in Paris, France. (Right) An ICBC branch in Hong Kong. In October, ICBC Financial Leasing announced it would provide 18 tankers to BP Shipping over the next 10 years, a deal estimated to be worth $869 million. Paul Boursier / For China Daily