|
Senate vote on tariffs for China might wait By Keith Bradsher (IHT) Updated: 2006-03-27 08:50
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/03/26/news/senators.php
A
weeklong trip to China by two U.S. senators sponsoring a trade bill targeting
China's currency has revealed differences between them, the latest in a series
of signs that they are less likely to press for a vote in the Senate in the week
ahead.
Senator Charles Schumer, Democrat of New York, and Senator Lindsey
Graham, Republican of South Carolina, have introduced legislation that would
impose a 27.5 percent tariff in two years on all imports to the United States
from China unless Beijing officials allow "substantial" appreciation in their
country's currency.
After a week of meetings with officials in Beijing,
Shanghai and Hong Kong, Schumer and Graham both said in an interview in Hong
Kong Saturday that they remained committed to advancing the legislation unless
China stopped intervening in currency markets and allowed its currency, known as
the yuan, or renminbi, to move higher.
But the senators also said that
Schumer had been more impressed than Graham by promises from Chinese officials
to liberalize their currency policies, although those promises included no
timetable.
Asked whether the newest development from the trip was the
emergence of some differences between the two sponsors of the bill, Schumer
replied, "That would be fair."
Schumer said that his views on China's
trade and monetary policy had evolved as a result of the trip and that he
believed the Chinese were taking steps to let the market determine the value of
their currency.
"I'm convinced they do want to get there, which I wasn't
a week ago," he said, adding that Graham was more skeptical.
Graham took
the same tone he has taken for months on the issue. "The status quo is
devastating to industries back home," he said.
South Carolina's textile
industry has been hit hard by Chinese competition, and its nascent auto parts
industry, which has grown up around the BMW factory near Spartanburg, is
beginning to face Chinese competition.
The practical implications of the
senators' differences may be limited for now. Graham said he wanted to see the
results of President Hu Jintao's visit to the White House in late April and what
the Treasury Department decides in its review at the end of April of whether
China manipulates its currency.
That suggests Graham is also willing to
take a wait-and-see approach and will not press for a vote in the next five
days.
Both senators said they had not made a final decision on whether to
follow through on their previous threats to force a vote in the Senate by Friday
and would wait to do so until after further discussions in Washington with
Treasury officials and others.
But differences between the senators could
affect policy later, especially if Chinese officials keep up their recent tilt
toward slightly more conciliatory rhetoric.
Currency traders around the
world have followed every remark by the senators in the past week with rapt
attention, especially as China has allowed its currency to creep up slightly
faster in the past three weeks, possibly because of pressure from the
senators.
Governments across the rest of Asia have been reluctant to
allow their currencies to rise against the dollar as long as the yuan remains
low, for fear of losing exports to China. But a strengthening of the yuan could
prompt the monetary authorities from Tokyo to Singapore to allow
appreciation.
The United States is importing almost $6 worth of goods for
every $1 of goods it sells to China.
The Chinese government bought $206.7
billion worth of foreign currencies last year, mainly dollars, to slow the
yuan's rise in value against other currencies.
That extensive
intervention made Chinese goods less expensive in foreign markets than they
would have been without the intervention, and made U.S., European, Japanese and
other imported goods more expensive in China.
China allowed the yuan to
appreciate by 2.1 percent on July 21, and the currency has very gradually
appreciated by another one percent since then.
At a news conference
Saturday at the U.S. Consulate in Hong Kong, both senators also addressed a
controversy over whether Hutchison Whampoa, a Hong Kong company, should be
allowed to win a contract to screen shipping containers in the Bahamas for any
sign that they are being used to send nuclear materials to the United
States.
Schumer praised the port in Hong Kong for screening all
containers bound for the United States, with the help of a dozen U.S. customs
officials here, and said that his main concern in the Bahamas was that U.S.
customs officials be allowed to supervise the screening there, and not which
company performed the screening.
|
|
|
|