CHICAGO - Overweight workers cost their bosses more in injury claims than
their lean colleagues, suggests a study that found the heaviest employees had
twice the rate of workers' compensation claims as their fit co-workers.
Overweight workers cost their bosses more in injury claims
than their lean colleagues, suggests a study that found the heaviest
employees had twice the rate of workers' compensation claims as their fit
co-workers. [AP]
|
Obesity experts said they hope
the study will convince employers to invest in programs to help fight obesity.
One employment attorney warned companies that treating fat workers differently
could lead to discrimination complaints.
Duke University researchers also found that the fattest workers had 13 times
more lost workdays due to work-related injuries, and their medical claims for
those injuries were seven times higher than their fit co-workers.
Overweight workers were more likely to have claims involving injuries to the
back, wrist, arm, neck, shoulder, hip, knee and foot than other employees.
The findings were based on eight years of data from 11,728 people employed by
Duke and its health system. Researchers found that workers with higher body mass
indexes, or BMIs, had higher rates of workers' compensation claims.
The most obese workers ¡ª those with BMIs of 40 or higher ¡ª had the highest
rates of claims and lost workdays. BMI is a measure of height and weight. A
6-foot, 300-pound person, for example, has a BMI of just over 40.
Study co-author Dr. Truls Ostbye said the findings should encourage employers
to sponsor fitness programs.
"There are many promising programs," Ostbye said. "We'd like to see more
research about what is truly effective."
James Hill, who heads the Center for Human Nutrition at the University of
Colorado, said managers will pay attention to the findings because injuries mean
more immediate financial losses than the future health-care costs of diabetes
and heart disease.
"When you see that claims rates double, I think that's going to get people's
attention," Hill said.
But there isn't enough good information about employer-sponsored programs
that work, said John Cawley, an expert in the economics of obesity at Cornell
University. Employers don't know whether paying for nutrition counseling,
obesity surgery or anti-obesity drugs through health insurance makes economic
sense, he said.
"It's now apparent to everybody that obesity is a big problem," Cawley said.
"But the research isn't there to know where to get biggest bang for the buck."
Cawley noted that BMI does not distinguish muscle from fat and can equate a
buff body builder to a couch potato. Although BMI, a measure of height and
weight, is used in most obesity research, Cawley's research has found that
blacks are particularly likely to be misclassified as obese by BMI.
New York employment attorney Richard Corenthal cautioned employers not to
overreact with discriminatory policies.
"Employers need to be careful not to view this study as a green light to
treat obese or overweight workers differently," Corenthal said.
The study, appearing in Monday's Archives of Internal Medicine, got funding
from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.