Smithfield deal still in question
Updated: 2013-09-05 10:55
By Michael Barris in New York (China Daily)
|
||||||||
A claim by a key shareholder in Smithfield Foods Inc that it has lined up buyers willing to pay more for the US pork giant than the $4.7 billion offered by China's Shuanghui International Holdings Ltd is being dismissed by an analyst as "hot air" aimed at getting a better deal for shareholders.
And a chief agriculture economist for Wells Fargo & Co said the claim by Starboard Value LP to have received indications of interest that imply a value "substantially" above the purchase price offered by Shuanghui raises questions.
Starboard, a New York-based hedge fund that holds a 5.7 percent stake in Smithfield, the world's largest hog farmer and pork processor, told shareholders in a letter on Tuesday that it received written interest from other parties who would pay "substantially" more for the Virginia-based company than the $34 a share that China's largest meat producer has accepted. The transaction - which also includes $2.38 billion in assumed debt - would be the biggest Chinese takeover of a US company.
Starboard also said in the letter that it plans to vote against the deal to force Smithfield to postpone a special meeting scheduled for Sept 24 so the fund can get time to find a more lucrative deal for shareholders.
Jim Fink, senior online editor for Investing Daily.com, was skeptical of Starboard's claims. He said Starboard's description of the indications of interest as "non-binding" was "hot air" and "nothing serious".
In July, Starboard said it hired New York-based Moelis & Co and Business Development Asia LLC to get a better offer for Smithfield shareholders. Starboard has said it believes that Virginia-based Smithfield would be worth more if it were broken into three parts - US pork production, hog farming and international sales of fresh and packaged meats - and then sold. The investment firm estimated the company's value at $9 billion to $10.8 billion.
"I doubt that breaking up Smithfield's businesses into pieces would generate a higher combined value," Fink said. "There is substantial value inherent in a vertically-integrated pork business - for example, quality control - that would be lost in a breakup."
Starboard did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
- Smithfield deal gets 2nd US security review
- US extends review of Shuanghui, Smithfield merger
- Smithfield's China bidders plan HK IPO after deal
- Senators skeptical about Smithfield deal
- Smithfield CEO quells fears over Chinese purchase
- Missouri govt's veto won't stop Smithfield deal
- China's Shuanghui confident in Smithfield purchase
- Caution urged in Shuanghui's Smithfield deal
- Shuanghui gets $7.9b loan for Smithfield acquisition
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
China's G20 role |
Sidestep the rush of modern life |
Private push |
Righting the wrongs of patent rights |
Questioning China's achievements |
Urban push |
Today's Top News
Diabetes still on the rise in Chinese adults
US faces substantial losses if Egypt aid halted
Bank of America finally exits CCB
US divided as Obama presses for Syria attack
Xi, Putin meeting to focus on 'mega projects'
Writers sue Apple for compensation
S. Korea a model for innovation: experts
Why China dominates solar panels
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |