WORLD> America
Jackson film greenlit; merchandise gets a yellow
(Agencies)
Updated: 2009-08-11 17:31

Jackson film greenlit; merchandise gets a yellow
Members of the Jackson family stand as Jermaine Jackson (C) speaks at the Michael Jackson memorial service at the Staples Center in Los Angeles July 7, 2009. [Agencies] 

Beckloff had until Monday to approve the film and allowed Jackson's mother, Katherine, to review the contracts and raise any objections.

Katherine Jackson did not object to the film, but her attorneys have raised questions about other agreements concerning AEG Live and merchandiser Bravado. The estate wants to enter into agreements with the two companies for a museum show of Jackson memorabilia and merchandising.

The memorabilia show would be on display in three cities which have not yet been announced.

A proposed agreement calls for Bravado to receive worldwide rights to Jackson merchandise, including items such as trading cards, apparel and cell phone themes.

Levitch, an attorney for Katherine Jackson, said he has raised several issues with the proposed agreements. He said the he was "not sure (AEG) would have been the first choice" to put on the museum tour.

Katherine Jackson's attorneys have frequently cited possible investigations into AEG's conduct and conflict of interests during court hearings.

 Full Coverage:
Jackson film greenlit; merchandise gets a yellow Michael Jackson, King of Pop

Related readings:
Jackson film greenlit; merchandise gets a yellow Jackson merchandise deal delayed
Jackson film greenlit; merchandise gets a yellow Report: Jackson kids' godfather claims paternity
Jackson film greenlit; merchandise gets a yellow No third autopsy planned for Michael Jackson
Jackson film greenlit; merchandise gets a yellow The selling of Jackson heats up in court action

Jackson film greenlit; merchandise gets a yellow Agreement proposed for Jackson-branded goodies

Attorneys for the promoter and the current administrators of Jackson's estate say they are unaware of any investigation by police or government regulators. Kathy Jorrie, an attorney for AEG, said the company would comply with any investigative inquiries.

Katherine Jackson's attorneys argued Monday that the singer's estate should own the footage and have control over who uses it after the movie deal is complete.

"Under no circumstances would AEG agree to such a thing," Jorrie said.

As part of agreements pending before the judge, AEG would have rights to use the footage indefinitely.

Howard Weitzman, an attorney representing the estate's current administrators, said some of Katherine Jackson's suggestions are "not acceptable." He said the contracts were aggressively negotiated and there was little room to strike a better deal.

"We feel that we're being second-guessed," Weitzman said. "I'm not sure why."

   Previous page 1 2 Next Page