xi's moments
Home | Americas

GameStop gamed in stock market tizzy

By WILLIAM HENNELLY in New York | China Daily Global | Updated: 2021-01-29 12:20

A GameStop store is pictured amid the COVID-19 pandemic in the Manhattan borough of New York City, Jan 27, 2021. [Photo/Agencies]

It looks like the latest installment of Wall Street vs Main Street.

The stock market has been in an uproar this week over the wildly speculative trading in a handful of stocks, namely GameStop, a retail outlet that sells video games, and has drawn the attention of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress and politicians from both sides of the aisle.

But the army of retail investors that have routed Wall Street professionals in recent days was dealt a blow Thursday, after online brokerages Robinhood Markets Inc and Interactive Brokers restricted trading in GameStop and several other stocks that had soared this week, including AMC Entertainment Group Inc, which is majority owned by Dalian Wanda Group in China; American Airlines, Nokia and BlackBerry Ltd.

Retail investors, celebrities and policymakers decried the restrictions, which allowed only selling, and online forums bubbled with anger.

GameStop shares sold off in New York Stock Exchange trading on Thursday, falling $147.55, or 42.8 percent to close at $197.44, after having traded as high as $482.55. Consider that GameStop's 52-week low was $2.57.

Buyers took the fight to the afterhours session, as GameStop jumped back up by $115.55, or 58.5 percent to $312.99.

Stocks are usually valued on their fundamentals; a crucial one is the price-to-earnings ratio. But fundamentals have been cast aside in this personal trading battle.

"It's irrational day trading, nothing fundamental," said Darryl Genovesi, Vertical Research analyst.

On the other side of the GameStop trade were some deep-pocketed hedge funds that were "short" the stock. One of those funds is connected to the new owner of the New York Mets baseball team, billionaire Steve Cohen.

"Short selling" is a stock market practice in which someone borrows a stock from another holder and then sells it with the expectation that the stock's price will fall.

For example, if the short-seller borrows the shares at $50, sells them at that price and later buys them back at $20 to return to the lender, the profit is $30 a share.

However, a "short squeeze" occurs if the stock does not fall, or even rises, and the borrower is forced to buy the shares back. The activity in which the "shorts" scramble to buy the shares back is called "short-covering".

The controversy over the retail-institutional standoff is somewhat reminiscent of the great recession of 2008, which was caused when several big Wall Street banks made bad bets on mortgage-backed securities. That crash led to the collapse of some established firms such as Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers.

Eventually, Congress and the US Treasury stepped in with financial lifelines to those banks, hence the expression "too big to fail".

With more people at home with more time on their hands during the COVID-19 pandemic, some have taken to day trading stocks.

The pandemic also has created additional disposable income for some, and a combination of fiscal stimulus and easy monetary policy has pumped up liquidity.

Deposits in commercial banks rose by $3 trillion in 2020, according to the Federal Reserve. Because interest rates, which determine rates paid on bank deposits, are at rock-bottom levels, many are looking for better returns on their money — such as in the stock market.

Jim Collins, CEO of Excelsior Capital Partners in New York, blamed the easy money policies of the Federal Reserve, the Treasury and now Robinhood.

"This week's action in GME (GameStop), among others, is even more evidence that the markets are easily manipulated. … "It's their fault. This is what free money hath wrought," Collins wrote in a column titled "The Genie Is Out of the Bottle, the Beast Has Been Unleashed" on realmoney.com.

The growth of apps like Robinhood, which now has more than 13 million users, has brought zero-cost trading to the cooped-up masses.

"I didn't realize it was this cultlike," short-seller Andrew Left of Citron Research told The Wall Street Journal. "It's just a get-rich-quick scheme."

The war began last week when hedge fund short-seller Left's bet against GameStop was met with a barrage of retail traders betting the other way. Left has since gotten out of the short position at a hefty loss.

As for GameStop, participants in online forums such as "wallstreetbets" on Reddit had noticed that the stock was heavily bet against by large investors. The "go long-the-shorts" strategy spilled over into other shorted stocks.

Some hedge funds, such as Citadel and fellow hedge fund Point72, run by Cohen, bailed out Melvin Capital, one of the firms betting against GameStop.

"Unfortunately, it's definitely not a one-off thing," said Randy Frederick, vice-president of trading and derivatives at the Schwab Center for Financial Research. "The type of activity that drove that higher, I believe, has caused people to try to duplicate that in other names."

"The unfortunate events in GameStop this week may be building a dangerous precedent for markets whereby retail investors act en masse to leverage their buying powers to spark fragility events," analysts at Wall Street bank JP Morgan said in a note.

But not everyone sees it that way.

"Robin Hood: a parable about stealing from the rich to give to the poor. Robinhood: an app about protecting the rich from being short squeezed by the poor," Jake Chervinsky, a lawyer for fintech company Compound, wrote on Twitter.

Two customers sued Robinhood over the trading ban, seeking damages.

"We do not believe this situation will subside until the exchanges and regulators halt or put certain symbols into liquidation only," Interactive Brokers said.

The Senate Banking Committee and the House Committee on Financial Services plan hearings on the recent stock market activity.

US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York criticized the decision by Robinhood to restrict retail trading.

Ocasio-Cortez tweeted that the restriction was "unacceptable", adding that Congress needed to know more about Robinhood's decision "to block retail investors from purchasing stock while hedge funds are freely able to trade the stock as they see fit".

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, a Republican, took to Twitter retweeting Ocasio-Cortez with rare words of agreement, writing "Fully agree."

She tweeted she was "happy to work with Republicans on this issue where there's common ground, but you almost had me murdered 3 weeks ago so you can sit this one out," a reference to suggestions that Cruz helped stir the Jan 6 storming of the Capitol.

Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, said in a statement, "We're done letting hedge fund billionaires treat the stock market like their personal playground, then taking their ball home as soon as they lose."

Billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban touted the wallstreetbets success as a counterweight to high-speed trading firms that have technological advantages against individuals.

"I LOVE LOVE what is going on," he wrote on Twitter on Wednesday.

Short-sellers are sitting on estimated losses of $71 billion from positions in US companies this year, data from analytics firm Ortex showed.

Reuters contributed to this story.

Global Edition
BACK TO THE TOP
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349