xi's moments
Home | Europe

MEPs cry foul over energy labels

By JULIAN SHEA in London | China Daily Global | Updated: 2022-02-08 09:59

A general view of the nuclear power plant, whose last unit will be shut down at the turn of the year, in Gundremmingen, Germany, on Dec 29, 2021. [Photo/Agencies]

Members of the European Parliament are on course for a confrontation with the European Commission over nuclear power and natural gas being designated as sustainable energy sources under green investment regulations.

In June 2020, MEPs approved a framework for the new classifications in a bid to make progress toward climate neutrality and provide private sector investors with clear ethical guidelines.

A statement from the European Union at the time heralded the proposals, known as the European Green Deal, as a way to move toward its emissions target, adding that "Europe needs about 260 billion euros ($297 billion) in extra investment every year over the next decade".

This, it said, would need private investment. "This requires clear criteria on what exactly is sustainable and eco-friendly; otherwise, some funding might be directed to 'greenwashing' projects that claim to be green, but in reality are not," the statement continued.

Divisive opinions

But the issue of what fits into the category has been divisive, with countries that are heavy users of nuclear or gas putting pressure on the Commission to ensure that the legislation wording does not work against them. MEPs are unhappy that they were not included in the consultation process of the text on how the categorization should be devised, and the issue could be coming to a head.

European Parliament rules mean that legislators cannot amend regulations, only either pass or reject them. Bas Eickhout, a Green MEP from the Netherlands, told the Financial Times there was "widespread annoyance" that MEPs had been "ignored "during the consultation.

The heart of the matter is the taxonomy of the rules, or the scientific classification of fuel sources.

"Whereas the taxonomy was meant to be science-based, it is now subject to political meddling," said Paul Tang, another Dutch MEP from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats.

"The commission uses the back door of a delegated act, rather than the front door of primary legislation, to push this through."

MEPs have up to six months in which they can vote to reject the new rules, if they can pull together a majority of 353 votes, as well as obvious party and bloc sympathies and national attitudes which may affect voting.

Germany is an anti-nuclear country, but Steffen Hebestreit, spokesperson for Chancellor Olaf Scholz, said "we need natural gas as a bridging technology" for the time being.

Global Edition
BACK TO THE TOP
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349