Global EditionASIA 中文双语Français
Home / World / World Watch

Questions arise as global economy faces transition

By Michael Spence | China Daily Global | Updated: 2022-06-10 09:25
Share - WeChat
A cargo ship sits at PortMiami in Miami Beach, Florida, on June 9, 2022. [Photo/Agencies]

Recent conversations about the global economy and markets have been defined by a set of recurring questions. While there are many moving parts that are difficult to capture in a single clear picture, it is worth attempting to bring some of the biggest issues into better focus.

The first question is straightforward: Is a recession looming? With authoritative growth forecasts like those from the International Monetary Fund having been revised significantly downward, and likely to be downgraded further, there is good reason to worry.

But a global recession-defined as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth-remains unlikely, though a major shock, such as a dramatic expansion of conflict or a sudden and significant disruption in a key market like energy, could change this outlook.

However, some economies certainly will contract. Russia's GDP will surely shrink, even with higher fuel prices, as a result of severe and most likely prolonged Western sanctions.

Europe, too, is likely to experience a recession, owing to high energy prices, heavy dependence on fossil-fuel imports, and the costly imperative of rapidly weaning itself from Russian supplies.

In addition, many lower-income countries-for which soaring food and energy prices are compounding the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic-are facing harder times.

The second key question relates to the trajectory of inflation. The proximate cause of recent price increases is supply-chain blockages and imbalances between supply and demand. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has intensified upward pressure on energy, commodity and food prices.

But inflation is also being fueled by secular trends that are not set to fade anytime soon. Populations representing about 75 percent of the global economy are aging, labor-force participation is declining, and productivity growth is trending downward.

Add to that a coming policy-driven diversification of supply and demand linkages and an extended period of supply-constrained growth with embedded inflationary pressures seems likely.

The third recurring question is: What is next for the tech sector and the digital transformation that it is propelling? Lockdowns and other public-health measures spurred an acceleration in the adoption of digital technologies during the pandemic. However, contrary to market expectations, this trend is likely to slow as pandemic restrictions are removed.

Amid overly optimistic growth projections, equity markets produced valuations that would have been unrealistic in the best of times. At a time of surging inflation, monetary tightening and falling growth projections, markets have begun correcting. Not surprisingly, growth stocks, whose value is derived from expected future cash flows, and which tend to be concentrated in the tech sector, have fallen particularly sharply.

Higher market volatility will have important short-run consequences, because venture-capital and private-equity funding, which plays a vital role in supporting innovative, potentially high-growth companies, is not insulated from it.

A final question that seems to be preoccupying minds lately is whether the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Europe's resolve to reduce its dependence on Russian oil and gas, and sky-high fossil-fuel prices will derail the low-carbon transition. Fortunately, there are good reasons to think that they might not, at least not in a lasting way.

For starters, high fossil-fuel prices create a strong incentive for countries and consumers to boost energy efficiency and invest in sustainable energy solutions. In this sense, they go some way toward offsetting the failure to establish an effective global carbon-pricing program.

High fossil-fuel prices will have adverse distributional effects within and across countries, resembling the impact of a regressive tax. But these effects can be mitigated, ideally through some form of income redistribution.

What governments should not do is subsidize fossil fuels by regulating final prices below market levels, as this would weaken the incentive to pursue more sustainable options. There is a good argument for stabilizing energy prices to encourage investment in alternatives. But that does not mean cutting off the peaks while leaving the troughs in place.

Geopolitics is also bolstering the clean-energy incentive: Unlike fossil fuels, renewables largely do not create external dependencies. The green transition is thus a powerful mechanism for increasing resilience and reducing vulnerability to the weaponization of energy supplies.

The author is a Nobel laureate in economics, an emeritus professor at Stanford University and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349